A little too slow

[RaduMihai]

Photomatix is not so sharp on final images, but it is faster then SNS.
About speed, same news?

[aparis99]

v2.* is much faster than v1.4.x

[Sebastian Nibisz]

Some operations require high computing power. Photomatix loads images faster, but you must to wait for the refresh image after changing any parameter.

[Barron]

"v2.* is much faster than v1.4.x"

Yeah it is much faster.

[RaduMihai]

Maybe it is much faster than 1.4 ...but on my system WIN 7, take 2.5 minutes = 150 seconds to make a HDR from 3 tif files.
So, 30 tif files will process in 25 minutes....do you think this is a good time? Easy HDR that make almost same toning map, take less. Photomatix...less more....but have no so sharp/
You must have a SSD to work good.

[Sebastian Nibisz]

SNS-HDR, easyHDR and Photomatix do not make the same toning map. They use completely different algorithms and have different adjustment parameters.

[RaduMihai]

Easy HDR for me same as SNS -HSR as tonemaping final.

[phil68]

"Easy HDR for me same as SNS -HSR as Tonempfindung final."

Sorry, but EasyHDR is completely different and has big issues with Highlights!
I have both, but I use SNS 90% of the time....
And by the way: EasyHDR isn't that faster!
The only thing where I see big advantages of EasyHDR is the gosting option...
Phil

[RaduMihai]

And by the way: EasyHDR isn't that faster!

Wrong.

[RaduMihai]

Sorry, but EasyHDR is completely different and has big issues with Highlights

Easy HDT made same final image as SNS - HDR. No much differ.
If you don't know how to shot in Highlights...it is your problem.