by kymarto » Fri Feb 24, 2012 8:55 am
The latest versions of SNS with highlight control put it in the top rank of HDR programs. I personally use both SNS and Photomatix, since they give very different looks. Aside from strict deghosting, I find that Photomatix does geometric correction during merging that SNS does not do, and this is especially important when handholding wide shots. But I often want to do the tonemapping in SNS, so I usually make the radiance file in Photomatix (especially if deghosting is needed) and tonemap in SNS. This works very, very well. There is very little difference in the final SNS image whether the radiance file is made in SNS or in Photomatix.
Also I have found that in some cases, there are fewer colored artifacts in an SNS image made with a Photomatix radiance file than an SNS radiance file. Sometimes I tonemap in both programs and mask or blend the images together. I find that SNS makes very nice skies, whereas I sometimes like the microcontrast in Photomatix. Masking and merging makes a nice final image.
Finally, there is no free lunch. Photomatix has very large, very soft halos, which are often hard to correct or unappealing. SNS has super halo control, but it tends to leave a one or two pixel wide white halo at some contrast transitions, which are time-consuming to eliminate. I am finding that both programs are worthwhile to have.