A little too slow

Want to talk about SNS-HDR, or do you have suggestions, requests, or how-to questions? Post here!
Chcesz porozmawiać o SNS-HDR, masz sugestię, próśbę, lub jakieś pytania? Pisz tutaj!

Re: A little too slow

Postby Sebastian Nibisz » Fri Apr 07, 2017 5:28 pm

You use easyHDR if it is faster and generates the same images. You do not need faster SNS-HDR.
User avatar
Sebastian Nibisz
Site Admin
 
Posts: 844
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:51 am

Re: A little too slow

Postby RaduMihai » Fri Apr 07, 2017 7:09 pm

Easy HDR it is not free....
RaduMihai
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2017 4:17 pm

Re: A little too slow

Postby fotolights.de » Tue Apr 25, 2017 9:25 am

Could you post some examples? Both softwares to default settings and compute time.
fotolights.de
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:21 am

Re: A little too slow

Postby phil68 » Tue Apr 25, 2017 10:42 am

Sorry, Guys... the goal is NOT speed, but picture quality!
I am mostly using SNS BECAUSE the results are excellent, especially for high contrasts!
and YES, that cost money.... :mrgreen:
Phil
User avatar
phil68
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 6:08 pm
Location: Rustenhart, F

Re: A little too slow

Postby fotolights.de » Thu Apr 27, 2017 10:24 am

Yes, I agree and it's worth every cent.
IMHO SNS beats every other HDR software.

That's why I'm interested in the comparison.
fotolights.de
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:21 am

Re: A little too slow

Postby Joghi » Fri Apr 28, 2017 6:35 am

i tested many HDR-programs. it is correct, sns takes more time for loading the images than photomatix. But in sns you have full realtime response when changing parameters. In photomatix the interface is much slower and after every slider change you have to wait, that´s boring. And by the way, for my opinion, the result in sns is much more looking natural and realistic than in pm and the handling of details and highlights is much more precise.

greez Joghi
Joghi
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 12:50 pm

Re: A little too slow

Postby Fraenzken » Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:45 am

I gave EasyHDR a go a while ago. While it is initially a bit faster than SNS-HDR, changing the parameters takes much more time. And the results of EasyHDR are not nearly as good in my opinion.
Fraenzken
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 2:48 pm

Re: A little too slow

Postby Joghi » Wed May 03, 2017 6:58 pm

... and i forgot to say that easyhdr tends to unpleasent halos when increasing details and/or microcontrast.

Seb has done a great job and good work has to be payed. And all that greedy fools who think they can get other mans work for nothing should sit on their lazy asses and learn how to program their own apps.

greez Joghi
Joghi
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 12:50 pm

Re: A little too slow

Postby phil68 » Thu May 04, 2017 6:02 am

In my opinion, this thread has to be closed!
this discussion makes not sense at all!! :mrgreen:
Phil
User avatar
phil68
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 6:08 pm
Location: Rustenhart, F

Re: A little too slow

Postby aparis99 » Sun May 07, 2017 6:56 pm

RaduMihai wrote:
Sorry, but EasyHDR is completely different and has big issues with Highlights


Easy HDT made same final image as SNS - HDR. No much differ.
If you don't know how to shot in Highlights...it is your problem.


That's rude.
Takes me about 40 seconds to merge 3 30MP images on my 4-year-old PC.
How about, if you don't have a PC fast enough to render multiple images relatively quickly, "it is your problem"...
aparis99
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2015 4:44 am

Previous

Return to Discussion & Questions / Dyskusja i pytania

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron